Curtis Pride, former professional baseball player who happens to be deaf, is coaching Galludet’s baseball team. A former Gallaudet student returned at age 30 as a pitcher because of Pride. Read the inspiring story at USA Today.
LATEST ARTICLES
Having multiple WordPress installs and trying to install it over the previous URL caused all kinds of trouble for this little blog. While you can run multiple WordPress installs, getting it right is complicated.
So I chucked it all and just used a domain that was sitting unused. Yes, strange name, but meaningful to me. All the old content is here and in its original place.
It feels great to be able to report what’s going on and share with you again.
I am transitioning Bionic Ear Blog to WordPress. Yes, I know the posts look awful as they have old markup. I am working on it a little bit at a time. Thanks for your patience.
Also, all the post links are gone. So there will be a lot of broken links. Ugh… dirty job, but had to be done.
Image via Wikipedia
A New Meme Is Brewing: YouTube CaptionFail. This is one of those situations where you wonder is it good to have captioning even though a lot of it is messed up or no captioning.
I tried to autocaption two of my previously captioned videos. I took off the captions and let YouTube try its hand. Well, so much for a fun opportunity to comparing the original captioned video and YouTube’s. YouTube’s autocaptioning failed in both cases. Maybe my accent was too much for it.
OK, I’ll take a little something over nothing. Heck, you can get a lot of laughs by searching for youtube caption fail in Twitter. Latest from YouTube on captioning and YouTube’s autocaptioning instructions. Also, here’s a blog post about Google’s Smart Captioning Move.
Just last night, I caught a funny caption mistake. The caption said, “A strange couple” in reference to Jin and Sun on Lost. I said to my husband, “Oh my gosh… that’s so politically incorrect.”
“It’s ‘estranged,’” corrected my husband. And that made sense.
Talk about a bad typo.
More captionfails:
What are some of your favorite captionfails?
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ff3f4fb9-d19a-49ce-86ab-6ccf85c74902)
STC AccessAbility SIG has two great articles, What is Unclear About Captioning and Olympian Anger — Is It So Hard to Remember Accessibility (amen!). More on Vancouver Olympic Websites from 456 Berea St.
Mike Paciello provides a short update on the Section 508 / Section 255 Guidelines.
Thanks to Laura Carlson for all the links. What have you read lately?
Image via Wikipedia
Source: Deafnetwork
On Friday, Feb. 19, 2010, two important new closed captioning rules were published in the Federal Register and went into effect. The new rules require immediate attention by video programming distributors — including broadcast television stations — to ensure that they respond promptly to viewer complaints regarding closed captioning issues, and to ensure that they timely file contact information with the FCC by March 22, 2010.
As detailed in Davis Wright Tremaine’s November 2008 advisory and subsequent January 2009 advisory update, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted a Declaratory Ruling and Order in late 2008 that, among other things, imposed new requirements on video programming distributors with respect to fielding inquiries and complaints about closed captioning. While the implementation of some aspects of those rules was delayed initially, with Friday’s publication in the Federal Register, two of those are now in effect. The new rules, and the obligations they impose on video programming distributors, are discussed below.
Streamlined complaint process
First, the Commission’s earlier Order revised the complaint process for complaints involving closed captioning rules, and with the Feb. 19 publication in the Federal Register, the new complaint procedures are effective immediately. The revised complaint procedures are as follows:
- Viewers who believe that a video programming distributor has failed to meet its captioning obligations may now file a complaint directly with either the FCC or with the program distributor, e.g., cable operator, television broadcaster or DBS provider. (Previously, viewers were required to first file complaints with distributors.)
- If a complaint is filed with a program distributor, then the distributor must respond to the viewer complaint in writing within 30 days of receipt. If a video programming distributor fails to respond to the complainant within 30 days, or if the complainant is unsatisfied with the response, the viewer may then file a complaint with the FCC within 30 days.
- If a complaint is filed directly with the FCC, the FCC will forward the complaint to the program distributor, which will be required to respond to the FCC in writing within 30 days of receipt. (Previously, distributors were required to respond to FCC complaints within 15 days.) In responding to a complaint, the video programming distributor must provide the Commission with sufficient records and documentation to demonstrate that it has complied with the Commission’s rules.
- Viewer complaints must be in writing and must be filed within 60 days of the alleged violation (whereas previously complaints could be filed within the calendar quarter in which the alleged violation occurred). The complaint also must state with specificity the alleged Commission rule violated and include some evidence of the alleged rule violation.
New captioning contact requirements
Second, in order to facilitate the ability for viewers to (1) raise immediate captioning concerns (such as garbled or missing captions), and (2) file captioning complaints, video programming distributors must publicize appropriate contact information and also provide contact information to the Commission.
To assist viewers with immediate captioning concerns while they are watching a program, video programming distributors must publish a telephone number, fax number and e-mail address for purposes of receiving and responding immediately to any closed captioning concerns. The revised rules require that “customers using this dedicated contact information must be able to reach someone, either directly or indirectly, who can address the consumer’s captioning concerns.”
Under the new rule, distributors must ensure that any staff reachable through this contact information has the capability to immediately respond to and address viewers’ concerns, and in situations where the captioning problem does not reside with the distributor, the staff person receiving the inquiry should refer the matter appropriately for resolution.
Distributors are not required to alter their hours when they have staff available, but if calls are placed when staff is not available, such calls and inquiries must be returned or addressed within 24 hours. The FCC also expects distributors to take measures to accommodate calls placed through a Telecommunications Relay Service operator.
In addition, distributors also must separately designate a contact person for the receipt of written (non-immediate) captioning complaints. This contact person must have primary responsibility for captioning issues and compliance with the FCC rules. The contact information must include the contact person’s name, title/office, telephone number, fax number, postal mailing address and e-mail address. A distributor’s contact information must be included on the distributor’s Web site (if it has a Web site), in billing invoices (if any) and in telephone directories (if the distributor already directly advertises or has a paid expanded listing, i.e., more than merely name, number and location in standard font, in a telephone directory).
The FCC will maintain a list of video programming distributors’ contact information for purposes of resolving closed captioning issues. Accordingly, distributors–including cable systems, broadcast television stations and satellite television providers–must file their contact information with the FCC by March 22, 2010. Distributors must provide the required contact information both for handling immediate concerns and for receiving written captioning complaints.
The best way for video programming distributors to file this information with the FCC is to visit its Web site and submit the information online. The Commission’s Web site contains a detailed form with step-by-step instructions. Alternatively, the contact information can be e-mailed directly to the FCC’s Disability Rights Office at: CLOSEDCAPTIONING_POC@fcc.gov.
Video programming distributors must keep their contact information current and update both their Web sites and the Commission’s database within 10 business days of any changes.
Finally, the Commission has stayed the effectiveness of the rule that would require video programming distributors to forward closed captioning complaints to a third party in certain circumstances. Because of the potential conflict with laws prohibiting the disclosure of personally identifiable information to third parties, the Commission has stayed the implementation of this rule until it can review the issue further and potentially issue a notice of proposed rulemaking.
[Source]
Additional information
https://esupport.fcc.gov/sform2000/formC!input.action?form_page=2000C
http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/closedcaption.html
http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm?sid=&id=d1e3
http://www.nad.org/news/2010/2/fcc-announces-new-closed-captioned-complaint-rules
http://www.televisionbroadcast.com/article/95370
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2ae3c380-63ec-47b2-b2f4-cf8b498d21de)
Image via Wikipedia
Does it ever end? Apparently, the Winter Olympic Games in Vancouver has not learned anything from the Olympic-sized accessibility problems of the past.
Joe Clark provides the details.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a0acbb8e-aa64-4984-a2f3-ca7f75649598)
Image via Wikipedia
I thought I had blogged this story, but only found [bits](http://www.meryl.net/ci/2007/05/reading_to_stud.html) and [pieces](http://www.meryl.net/ci/2007/05/talking_to_seco_1.html). So here’s the whole story as my daughter remembers it.
I’d like to think that I was a unique individual from birth. I learned, at a very young age, that my family was different, but my parents instilled a sense of pride in me. Everything I was, no matter how it compared to others, was something I could wear proudly. My mother is deaf, and this never struck me as strange.
However, in second grade when children still loved to see their parents anywhere they went, mothers and fathers would come into class to read aloud. My mother doesn’t know American Sign Language (ASL), nor does she need it. She reads lips with crisp perfection; even I couldn’t help but to imitate it in my early years. She also speaks clearly, of course with a slight accent, but as time goes on, it lessens. I never heard any strange accent, only the sound of my mother’s voice.
This isn’t what my peers heard. They mocked her openly in front of me, and asked why she sounded so weird. What a blow this was, the first time that anything about me was “strange” and unaccepted. I wasn’t ashamed, though. To this day my mother remains an incredibly accomplished woman and writer. I get my language abilities straight from her. (Unfortunately, I acquired my father’s penmanship.)
What’s strange is that I think I brought a book with a deaf character. But what was different between talking to my daughter’s class and my son’s class is that in my son’s class — I opened with an explanation of the deafness rather than letting the book do the talking.
I accept that children and even some adults will look at me in a strange way when my mouth opens and the words spill. But I do not accept my children’s classmates making fun of me in front of my kids. That puts the burden on my kids for something that has nothing to do with them.
After a great experience in talking to two first grade classes this year, I hope to speak to more. It was college / career week. So I volunteered to talk to the kids about going to college, how college helped me on my career path, adjusting to college and making a career. I explained some of the barriers and how technology has erased many of them.
I believe education is the path to understanding and acceptance.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2416dcf3-0b59-4337-b3e1-6131ec82f041)
Image via Wikipedia
From [Hearing Aid Tax Credit web site](http://www.hearingaidtaxcredit.org/):
**What would the Hearing Aid Assistance Tax Credit Act do? And, what are the differences in the House and Senate legislation?**
The bill in the House of Representatives (H.R. 1646) would provide a tax credit towards the purchase of each hearing aid of up to $500 per hearing aid, available once every 5 years. It would be available to 1) individuals age 55 and over, or 2) those purchasing a hearing aid for a dependent. The House bill excludes coverage for those with incomes over $200,000/year. The bill in the Senate (S. 1019) would provide the same $500 credit but would cover all age groups.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=9efc6697-2cbf-4212-bfdf-ab7c1a465fb7)
Learn more about the [Hearing Aid Tax Credit](http://www.hearingaidtaxcredit.org/cosponsors.cfm).
[Who Are You Hiring in 2010? Thinking About Diversity in Another Way](http://www.fistfuloftalent.com/2010/01/who-are-you-hiring-in-2010.html) is a fabulous article that looks at hiring trends and thinking beyond the label. See [Think Beyond the Label](http://www.thinkbeyondthelabel.com/) to learn how you can evolve your workforce. The web site is “committed to making the business case for employing people with disabilities.”
Here’s an article that looks at [five myths and the real facts for employers](http://www.thinkbeyondthelabel.com/Learning-Tools/5Myths-and-RealFacts.aspx).
I should be grateful I’ve had a great pre-freelance career working in the federal government as well as for two big telecommunications companies.
RSS Feeds
Twitter Feeds-
Sponsors
-
